| Title |
Art Forms in Nature: radiolaria from Haeckel and Blaschka to 3D nanotomography, quantitative image analysis, evolution, and contemporary art
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theory in Biosciences, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12064-019-00289-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John R. Jungck, Roger Wagner, Denis van Loo, Bathsheba Grossman, Noppadon Khiripet, Jutarat Khiripet, Wongarnet Khantuwan, Margeurita Hagan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| China | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Design | 3 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 25% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,706,513
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from Theory in Biosciences
#64
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,340
of 363,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory in Biosciences
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.