| Title |
Narrative review: clinical assessment of peripheral tissue perfusion in septic shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0511-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geoffroy Hariri, Jérémie Joffre, Guillaume Leblanc, Michael Bonsey, Jean-Remi Lavillegrand, Tomas Urbina, Bertrand Guidet, Eric Maury, Jan Bakker, Hafid Ait-Oufella |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 21 | 22% |
| Colombia | 11 | 11% |
| Peru | 4 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Guatemala | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | 1% |
| Serbia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 87 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 7% |
| Scientists | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 262 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Researcher | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 62 | 24% |
| Unknown | 85 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 134 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Unknown | 90 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#706,145
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#68
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,260
of 366,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.