↓ Skip to main content

Gender Differences in Ethics Research: The Importance of Controlling for the Social Desirability Response Bias

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
207 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
Title
Gender Differences in Ethics Research: The Importance of Controlling for the Social Desirability Response Bias
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-0843-8
Authors

Derek Dalton, Marc Ortegren

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 3 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 267 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 21%
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 35 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Researcher 19 7%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 63 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 71 25%
Psychology 54 19%
Social Sciences 26 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 24 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 74 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,734,658
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#291
of 2,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,563
of 108,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.