You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
臨時余震観測に基づく2016年熊本地震における西原村および南阿蘇村の被災橋梁に作用した地震動の評価
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Structural Engineering, A, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.11532/structcivil.63a.265 |
| Authors |
秦 吉弥, 矢部 正明, 野津 厚, 葛西 昭, 高橋 良和, 松崎 裕, 秋山 充良 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,942,734
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Structural Engineering, A
#1
of 12 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,944
of 342,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Structural Engineering, A
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them