Title |
Is there a difference in regional read [18F]flutemetamol amyloid patterns between end-of-life subjects and those with amnestic mild cognitive impairment?
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00259-019-04282-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gill Farrar, José Luis Molinuevo, Michelle Zanette |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 26% |
Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 24% |
Psychology | 6 | 16% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 11% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,412,365
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#476
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,438
of 353,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.