↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Whose carbon is burnable? Equity considerations in the allocation of a “right to extract”

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: Whose carbon is burnable? Equity considerations in the allocation of a “right to extract”
Published in
Climatic Change, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02381-1
Authors

Sivan Kartha, Simon Caney, Navroz K. Dubash, Greg Muttitt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 11%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 9 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2019.
All research outputs
#18,671,706
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#5,552
of 5,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,524
of 351,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#56
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.