You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Outcomes and Treatment Strategies for Autoimmunity and Hyperinflammation in Patients with RAG Deficiency
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.02.038 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jocelyn R Farmer, Zsofia Foldvari, Boglarka Ujhazi, Suk See De Ravin, Karin Chen, Jack J H Bleesing, Catharina Schuetz, Waleed Al-Herz, Roshini S Abraham, Avni Y Joshi, Beatriz T Costa-Carvalho, David Buchbinder, Claire Booth, Andreas Reiff, Polly J Ferguson, Asghar Aghamohammadi, Hassan Abolhassani, Jennifer M Puck, Mehdi Adeli, Caterina Cancrini, Paolo Palma, Alice Bertaina, Franco Locatelli, Gigliola Di Matteo, Raif S Geha, Maria G Kanariou, Lilia Lycopoulou, Marianna Tzanoudaki, John W Sleasman, Suhag Parikh, Gloria Pinero, Bernard M Fischer, Ghassan Dbaibo, Ekrem Unal, Turkan Patiroglu, Musa Karakukcu, Khulood Khalifa Al-Saad, Meredith A Dilley, Sung-Yun Pai, Cullen M Dutmer, Erwin W Gelfand, Christoph B Geier, Martha M Eibl, Hermann M Wolf, Lauren A Henderson, Melissa M Hazen, Carmem Bonfim, Beata Wolska-Kuśnierz, Manish J Butte, Joseph D Hernandez, Sarah K Nicholas, Polina Stepensky, Shanmuganathan Chandrakasan, Maurizio Miano, Emma Westermann-Clark, Vera Goda, Gergely Kriván, Steven M Holland, Olajumoke Fadugba, Sarah E Henrickson, Ahmet Ozen, Elif Karakoc-Aydiner, Safa Baris, Ayca Kiykim, Robbert Bredius, Birgit Hoeger, Kaan Boztug, Olga Pashchenko, Benedicte Neven, Despina Moshous, Jean-Pierre de Villartay, Ahmed Aziz Bousfiha, Harry R Hill, Luigi D Notarangelo, Jolan E Walter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| Mexico | 1 | 14% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 31 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,544,232
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#1,035
of 4,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,217
of 364,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#33
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.