↓ Skip to main content

Valproic acid may exerts its cytotoxic effect through rassf1a expression induction in acute myeloid leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Valproic acid may exerts its cytotoxic effect through rassf1a expression induction in acute myeloid leukemia
Published in
Tumor Biology, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13277-016-4985-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zare-Abdollahi Davood, Safari Shamsi, Hamid Ghaedi, Riazi-Isfahani Sahand, Ghadyani Mojtaba, Tabarraee Mahdi, Mirfakhraie Reza, Mohammad Javad Ebrahimi, Reyhaneh Sadat Miri-Moosavi, Sara Boosaliki, Omrani Mir Davood

Abstract

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), despite the acceptance of standard intensive chemotherapy as an optimal induction regimen for all age groups, in the elderly patients, the best treatment should meet the challenge of multiple factors like age, comorbidities, and cytogenetics, making them ineligible for standard induction chemotherapy. Using the current low-intensity therapies like decitabine, azacitidine, and low-dose cytarabine as a single arm, outcomes for these patients remain poor. As a histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) exhibit anticancer activity by triggering apoptosis, the mechanism of which is not yet completely clarified. To explore the possible connection between VPA treatment and the Hippo pathway as an apoptosis stimulating route, we also explore the expression of major components of this pathway and for the first time we postulate a relationship between VPA treatment and cell death induction through RASSF1A expression induction. Furthermore, we demonstrate that autophagy inhibition by chloroquine (CQ) significantly augmented the cytotoxic effect of VPA on AML cells, especially in those with unfavorable and normal karyotype. Regarding that VPA and CQ are well-tolerated drugs and our presumptive results of usefulness of VPA + CQ in three cytogenetic risk groups of AML, this combinatorial therapy could represent an attractive treatment option for older AML patients unfit for intensive therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Lecturer 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Chemistry 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,308,732
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,834
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,718
of 297,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#110
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.