You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Changes in belowground biodiversity during ecosystem development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1818400116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo, Richard D. Bardgett, Peter M. Vitousek, Fernando T. Maestre, Mark A. Williams, David J. Eldridge, Hans Lambers, Sigrid Neuhauser, Antonio Gallardo, Laura García-Velázquez, Osvaldo E. Sala, Sebastián R. Abades, Fernando D. Alfaro, Asmeret A. Berhe, Matthew A. Bowker, Courtney M. Currier, Nick A. Cutler, Stephen C. Hart, Patrick E. Hayes, Zeng-Yei Hseu, Martin Kirchmair, Victor M. Peña-Ramírez, Cecilia A. Pérez, Sasha C. Reed, Fernanda Santos, Christina Siebe, Benjamin W. Sullivan, Luis Weber-Grullon, Noah Fierer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 8% |
| Spain | 8 | 7% |
| France | 7 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 44 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 50% |
| Scientists | 50 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 384 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 384 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 22% |
| Researcher | 77 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 59 | 15% |
| Unknown | 97 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 109 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 84 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 4% |
| Unknown | 149 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#358,962
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6,555
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,256
of 357,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#147
of 1,059 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,059 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.