You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Innovative Collagen Nano‐Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds Offer a Highly Efficient Non‐Viral Gene Delivery Platform for Stem Cell‐Mediated Bone Formation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advanced Materials, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/adma.201103828 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caroline M. Curtin, Gráinne M. Cunniffe, Frank G. Lyons, Kazuhisa Bessho, Glenn R. Dickson, Garry P. Duffy, Fergal J. O'Brien |
| Abstract |
The ability of nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA) particles developed in-house to act as non-viral delivery vectors is assessed. These nHA particles are combined with collagen to yield bioactive, biodegradable collagen nano-hydroxyapatite (coll-nHA) scaffolds. Their ability to act as gene-activated matrices for BMP2 delivery is demonstrated with successful transfection of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) resulting in high calcium production. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 161 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 31% |
| Researcher | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 24 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 31 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 14% |
| Materials Science | 23 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2012.
All research outputs
#16,727,629
of 24,602,766 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#12,356
of 16,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,043
of 253,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#118
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,602,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.