↓ Skip to main content

Content-Specific Interpretation Bias in Children with Varying Levels of Anxiety: The Role of Gender and Age

Overview of attention for article published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Content-Specific Interpretation Bias in Children with Varying Levels of Anxiety: The Role of Gender and Age
Published in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10578-019-00883-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynn Mobach, Mike Rinck, Eni S. Becker, Jennifer L. Hudson, Anke M. Klein

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,841,066
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#217
of 926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,895
of 352,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.