↓ Skip to main content

Four new species of Eriocaulon (Eriocaulaceae) from Bahia, Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Kew Bulletin, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Four new species of Eriocaulon (Eriocaulaceae) from Bahia, Brazil
Published in
Kew Bulletin, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12225-019-9793-6
Authors

Earl Celestino de Oliveira Chagas, James Lucas da Costa-Lima, Ana Maria Giulietti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Professor 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 50%
Design 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,532,169
of 25,069,047 outputs
Outputs from Kew Bulletin
#854
of 1,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,753
of 358,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kew Bulletin
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,069,047 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,158 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.