↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotic misuse in respiratory tract infections in children and adults—a prospective, multicentre study (TAILORED Treatment)

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotic misuse in respiratory tract infections in children and adults—a prospective, multicentre study (TAILORED Treatment)
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10096-018-03454-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chantal B. van Houten, Asi Cohen, Dan Engelhard, John P. Hays, Roger Karlsson, Edward Moore, David Fernández, Racheli Kreisberg, Laurence V. Collins, Wouter de Waal, Karin M. de Winter-de Groot, Tom F. W. Wolfs, Pieter Meijers, Bart Luijk, Jan Jelrik Oosterheert, Rik Heijligenberg, Sanjay U. C. Sankatsing, Aik W. J. Bossink, Andrew Stubbs, Michal Stein, Sharon Reisfeld, Adi Klein, Ronit Rachmilevitch, Jalal Ashkar, Itzhak Braverman, Valery Kartun, Irena Chistyakov, Ellen Bamberger, Isaac Srugo, Majed Odeh, Elad Schiff, Yaniv Dotan, Olga Boico, Roy Navon, Tom Friedman, Liat Etshtein, Meital Paz, Tanya M. Gottlieb, Ester Pri-Or, Gali Kronenfeld, Einav Simon, Kfir Oved, Eran Eden, Louis J. Bont

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 61 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 72 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,255,960
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#253
of 2,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,135
of 438,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#10
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.