↓ Skip to main content

Novel biallelic loss-of-function KCNV2 variants in cone dystrophy with supernormal rod responses

Overview of attention for article published in Documenta Ophthalmologica, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Novel biallelic loss-of-function KCNV2 variants in cone dystrophy with supernormal rod responses
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10633-019-09679-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomoko Kutsuma, Satoshi Katagiri, Takaaki Hayashi, Kazutoshi Yoshitake, Daisuke Iejima, Tamaki Gekka, Kenichi Kohzaki, Kei Mizobuchi, Yukari Baba, Ryo Terauchi, Tomokazu Matsuura, Shinji Ueno, Takeshi Iwata, Tadashi Nakano

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 36%
Physics and Astronomy 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2019.
All research outputs
#18,671,706
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#322
of 462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,524
of 351,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 462 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.