↓ Skip to main content

The progressive substitution of hazard ratios for relative risks in biomedical research

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
The progressive substitution of hazard ratios for relative risks in biomedical research
Published in
Scientometrics, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11192-019-03059-2
Authors

Paul Monsarrat, Jean-Noel Vergnes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 43%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Social Sciences 2 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Computer Science 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,564,321
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,994
of 2,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,631
of 352,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#41
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.