| Title |
Recurrent KBTBD4 small in-frame insertions and absence of DROSHA deletion or DICER1 mutation differentiate pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) from pineoblastoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00401-019-01990-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julieann C. Lee, Tali Mazor, Richard Lao, Eunice Wan, Alpha B. Diallo, Nicholas S. Hill, Naina Thangaraj, Katherine Wendelsdorf, David Samuel, Cassie N. Kline, Anuradha Banerjee, Kurtis Auguste, Corey Raffel, Nalin Gupta, Mitchel Berger, David R. Raleigh, Anny Shai, Joanna J. Phillips, Andrew W. Bollen, Tarik Tihan, Arie Perry, Joseph Costello, David A. Solomon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,868,041
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,387
of 2,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,153
of 364,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#37
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.