↓ Skip to main content

It is efficient to monitor the status of implanted ureteral stent using a mobile social networking service application

Overview of attention for article published in Urolithiasis, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
It is efficient to monitor the status of implanted ureteral stent using a mobile social networking service application
Published in
Urolithiasis, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00240-019-01118-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yiwei Wang, Mingxi Xu, Wenfeng Li, Yuanshen Mao, Jun Da, Zhong Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Other 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 20 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 22 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#18,671,706
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Urolithiasis
#263
of 332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,507
of 351,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urolithiasis
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.