↓ Skip to main content

Clinical outcomes associated with screening and referral for depression in an acute cardiac ward

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Nursing, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical outcomes associated with screening and referral for depression in an acute cardiac ward
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, January 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03934.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chantal F Ski, Karen Page, David R Thompson, Robert A Cummins, Mike Salzberg, Linda Worrall‐Carter

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to describe the implementation of a depression screening and referral tool in two cardiac wards of a major metropolitan public hospital. The tool consisted of two sections: (1) screening for depression risk (Cardiac Depression Scale-5) and (2) consequential referral actions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 94 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 25%
Student > Master 19 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 19%
Psychology 15 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2013.
All research outputs
#19,826,308
of 24,364,603 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#4,704
of 5,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,539
of 253,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#29
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,364,603 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.