↓ Skip to main content

Locomotion: exploiting noise for state estimation

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Locomotion: exploiting noise for state estimation
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00422-018-0772-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Guckenheimer, Aurya Javeed

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 25%
Neuroscience 2 13%
Computer Science 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2019.
All research outputs
#18,671,706
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#578
of 681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,912
of 330,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 681 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.