↓ Skip to main content

Clinical evaluation of iron treatment efficiency among non-anemic but iron-deficient female blood donors: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Clinical evaluation of iron treatment efficiency among non-anemic but iron-deficient female blood donors: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Medicine, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-10-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Waldvogel, Baptiste Pedrazzini, Paul Vaucher, Raphael Bize, Jacques Cornuz, Jean-Daniel Tissot, Bernard Favrat

Abstract

Iron deficiency without anemia is related to adverse symptoms that can be relieved by supplementation. Since a blood donation can induce such an iron deficiency, we investigated the clinical impact of iron treatment after a blood donation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 117 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Researcher 13 11%
Other 7 6%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Sports and Recreations 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 31 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,047,958
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,819
of 3,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,114
of 249,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#15
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.