You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Heterogeneous clinical phenotypes and cerebral malformations reflected by rotatin cellular dynamics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brain, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/brain/awz045 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura V Vandervore, Rachel Schot, Esmee Kasteleijn, Renske Oegema, Katrien Stouffs, Alexander Gheldof, Martyna M Grochowska, Marianne L T van der Sterre, Leontine M A van Unen, Martina Wilke, Peter Elfferich, Peter J van der Spek, Daphne Heijsman, Anna Grandone, Jeroen A A Demmers, Dick H W Dekkers, Johan A Slotman, Gert-Jan Kremers, Gerben J Schaaf, Roy G Masius, Anton J van Essen, Patrick Rump, Arie van Haeringen, Els Peeters, Umut Altunoglu, Tugba Kalayci, Raymond A Poot, William B Dobyns, Nadia Bahi-Buisson, Frans W Verheijen, Anna C Jansen, Grazia M S Mancini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,590,880
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Brain
#3,115
of 7,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,591
of 352,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain
#63
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.