| Title |
CBT to reduce healthcare use for medically unexplained symptoms: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x701273 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brittni Jones, Amanda C de C Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 36% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Sweden | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 23% |
| Scientists | 5 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 12 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,409,883
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#671
of 4,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,184
of 447,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#20
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.