| Title |
Are bottom-up approaches good for promoting social–ecological fit in urban landscapes?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-019-01163-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johan P. Enqvist, Maria Tengö, Örjan Bodin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 31 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,470,745
of 24,294,745 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#449
of 1,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,313
of 356,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#19
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,294,745 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.