Title |
Negative impact of proteinuria on circulating myeloid dendritic cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10157-019-01724-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Masato Ikeda, Risa Terashima, Taku Yamada, Masahiro Suyama, Shinya Yokote, Masatsugu Nakao, Izumi Yamamoto, Keita Hirano, Hideo Okonogi, Hiroyasu Yamamoto, Takashi Yokoo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 30% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 2 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
Energy | 1 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,215,913
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#35
of 769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,657
of 354,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 769 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.