| Title |
Anticoagulation Strategies in Patients With Cancer JACC Review Topic of the Week
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ramya C. Mosarla, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Arman Qamar, Javid Moslehi, Gregory Piazza, Robert P. Giugliano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 22% |
| Spain | 12 | 9% |
| Canada | 6 | 5% |
| Brazil | 5 | 4% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 81 | 61% |
| Scientists | 24 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 197 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 10% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 19% |
| Unknown | 68 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 44% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 79 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#570,759
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,449
of 17,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,187
of 371,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#54
of 390 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 390 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.