↓ Skip to main content

Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing in the pelvis and acetabulum: from models and tools to implants

Overview of attention for article published in Die Unfallchirurgie, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing in the pelvis and acetabulum: from models and tools to implants
Published in
Die Unfallchirurgie, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00113-019-0626-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Fang, Hong Cai, Evelyn Kuong, Elvis Chui, Yuk Chuen Siu, Tao Ji, Igor Drstvenšek

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 8 6%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 45 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 32%
Engineering 24 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Materials Science 4 3%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 51 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2019.
All research outputs
#23,065,269
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Die Unfallchirurgie
#440
of 820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#332,796
of 380,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Unfallchirurgie
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 820 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.