↓ Skip to main content

Using Remote Sensing to Map the Risk of Human Monkeypox Virus in the Congo Basin

Overview of attention for article published in EcoHealth, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
Title
Using Remote Sensing to Map the Risk of Human Monkeypox Virus in the Congo Basin
Published in
EcoHealth, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10393-010-0355-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trevon Fuller, Henri A. Thomassen, Prime M. Mulembakani, Sara C. Johnston, James O. Lloyd-Smith, Neville K. Kisalu, Timothee K. Lutete, Seth Blumberg, Joseph N. Fair, Nathan D. Wolfe, Robert L. Shongo, Pierre Formenty, Hermann Meyer, Linda L. Wright, Jean-Jacques Muyembe, Wolfgang Buermann, Sassan S. Saatchi, Emile Okitolonda, Lisa Hensley, Thomas B. Smith, Anne W. Rimoin

Abstract

Although the incidence of human monkeypox has greatly increased in Central Africa over the last decade, resources for surveillance remain extremely limited. We conducted a geospatial analysis using existing data to better inform future surveillance efforts. Using active surveillance data collected between 2005 and 2007, we identified locations in Sankuru district, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) where there have been one or more cases of human monkeypox. To assess what taxa constitute the main reservoirs of monkeypox, we tested whether human cases were associated with (i) rope squirrels (Funisciurus sp.), which were implicated in monkeypox outbreaks elsewhere in the DRC in the 1980s, or (ii) terrestrial rodents in the genera Cricetomys and Graphiurus, which are believed to be monkeypox reservoirs in West Africa. Results suggest that the best predictors of human monkeypox cases are proximity to dense forests and associated habitat preferred by rope squirrels. The risk of contracting monkeypox is significantly greater near sites predicted to be habitable for squirrels (OR = 1.32; 95% CI 1.08-1.63). We recommend that semi-deciduous rainforests with oil-palm, the rope squirrel's main food source, be prioritized for monitoring.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 148 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Master 15 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 7%
Other 10 6%
Other 36 23%
Unknown 37 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 14%
Environmental Science 13 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 49 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,155,706
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#231
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,624
of 100,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them