↓ Skip to main content

When is Sessional Monitoring More Likely in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services?

Overview of attention for article published in Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
When is Sessional Monitoring More Likely in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services?
Published in
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10488-016-0725-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

J H. Edbrooke-Childs, D. Gondek, J. Deighton, P. Fonagy, M. Wolpert

Abstract

Sessional monitoring of patient progress or experience of therapy is an evidence-based intervention recommended by healthcare systems internationally. It is being rolled out across child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in England to inform clinical practice and service evaluation. We explored whether patient demographic and case characteristics were associated with the likelihood of using sessional monitoring. Multilevel regressions were conducted on N = 2609 youths from a routinely collected dataset from 10 CAMHS. Girls (odds ratio, OR 1.26), older youths (OR 1.10), White youths (OR 1.35), and youths presenting with mood (OR 1.46) or anxiety problems (OR 1.59) were more likely to have sessional monitoring. In contrast, youths under state care (OR 0.20) or in need of social service input (OR 0.39) were less likely to have sessional monitoring. Findings of the present research may suggest that sessional monitoring is more likely with common problems such as mood and anxiety problems but less likely with more complex cases, such as those involving youths under state care or those in need of social service input.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 20 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2017.
All research outputs
#4,207,420
of 25,028,065 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#143
of 693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,424
of 303,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,028,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.