↓ Skip to main content

High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
204 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
316 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
421 Mendeley
Title
High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00134-019-05590-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Rochwerg, D. Granton, D. X. Wang, Y. Helviz, S. Einav, J. P. Frat, A. Mekontso-Dessap, A. Schreiber, E. Azoulay, A. Mercat, A. Demoule, V. Lemiale, A. Pesenti, E. D. Riviello, T. Mauri, J. Mancebo, L. Brochard, K. Burns

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 204 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 421 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 11%
Other 40 10%
Student > Postgraduate 37 9%
Researcher 35 8%
Student > Master 32 8%
Other 73 17%
Unknown 157 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 171 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 10%
Engineering 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 1%
Other 22 5%
Unknown 162 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 192. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2021.
All research outputs
#211,304
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#152
of 5,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,516
of 365,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.