You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Technological Review of Wearable Cueing Devices Addressing Freezing of Gait in Parkinson’s Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sensors, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3390/s19061277 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dean Sweeney, Leo R. Quinlan, Patrick Browne, Margaret Richardson, Pauline Meskell, Gearóid ÓLaighin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 249 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 13% |
| Researcher | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 14% |
| Unknown | 87 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 41 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 28 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 12% |
| Unknown | 98 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,591,454
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Sensors
#718
of 24,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,094
of 364,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sensors
#20
of 816 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 816 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.