Title |
Genetic diversity and spatial genetic structure of African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) in the Greater Limpopo transfrontier conservation area
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Genetics, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10592-016-0821-x |
Authors |
Laura Tensen, Rosemary J. Groom, Joep van Belkom, Harriet T. Davies-Mostert, Kelly Marnewick, Bettine Jansen van Vuuren |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Zimbabwe | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 60% |
Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 79 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
Researcher | 10 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 10% |
Other | 15 | 19% |
Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 46% |
Environmental Science | 11 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,346,239
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#431
of 1,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,322
of 311,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.