↓ Skip to main content

Students’ Perception of Formative Assessment as an Instructional Tool in Medical Education

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Science Educator, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Students’ Perception of Formative Assessment as an Instructional Tool in Medical Education
Published in
Medical Science Educator, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40670-018-00687-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Youn Seon Lim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Professor 2 4%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 18 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Linguistics 3 6%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 19 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2019.
All research outputs
#20,561,572
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Medical Science Educator
#979
of 994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#371,978
of 438,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Science Educator
#32
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 994 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.