↓ Skip to main content

Facilitation of management plan development via spatial classification of areas invaded by alien invasive plant

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Facilitation of management plan development via spatial classification of areas invaded by alien invasive plant
Published in
Biological Invasions, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10530-019-01958-2
Authors

Takeshi Osawa, Munemitsu Akasaka, Naoki Kachi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 21%
Lecturer 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2019.
All research outputs
#18,673,707
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#2,084
of 2,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,870
of 352,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#47
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.