↓ Skip to main content

The study protocol of a cluster-randomised controlled trial of family-mediated personalised activities for nursing home residents with dementia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The study protocol of a cluster-randomised controlled trial of family-mediated personalised activities for nursing home residents with dementia
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2318-12-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva S van der Ploeg, Cameron J Camp, Barbara Eppingstall, Susannah J Runci, Daniel W O'Connor

Abstract

Following admission to a nursing home, the feelings of depression and burden that family carers may experience do not necessarily diminish. Additionally, they may experience feelings of guilt and grief for the loss of a previously close relationship. At the same time, individuals with dementia may develop symptoms of depression and agitation (BPSD) that may be related to changes in family relationships, social interaction and stimulation. Until now, interventions to alleviate carer stress and BPSD have treated carers and relatives separately rather than focusing on maintaining or enhancing their relationships. One-to-one structured activities have been shown to reduce BPSD and also improve the caring experience, but barriers such as a lack of resources impede the implementation of activities in aged care facilities. The current study will investigate the effect of individualised activities based on the Montessori methodology administered by family carers in residential care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 217 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 16%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 48 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 14%
Social Sciences 16 7%
Unspecified 14 6%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 51 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2012.
All research outputs
#17,655,049
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#2,506
of 3,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,168
of 243,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.