↓ Skip to main content

Differences in Autism Symptoms Between Minority and Non-Minority Toddlers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
Title
Differences in Autism Symptoms Between Minority and Non-Minority Toddlers
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10803-012-1445-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saime Tek, Rebecca J. Landa

Abstract

Little is known about whether early symptom presentation differs in toddlers with ASD from ethnic minority versus non-minority backgrounds. Within a treatment study for toddlers with ASD, we compared 19 minority to 65 Caucasian children and their parents on variables obtained from the Mullen Scales of Early Learning, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, and Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Caregiver Questionnaire. The majority of parents were from the upper classes irrespective of ethnic membership. Minority children had lower scores in language, communication, and gross motor than non-minority children. Findings indicate that subtle communication delays may be undetected or presumed unremarkable by parents of minority toddlers, and that more significant delays are needed to prompt the search for intervention services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 193 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 35 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 15%
Student > Master 29 15%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 38 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 35%
Social Sciences 34 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 44 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2017.
All research outputs
#858,307
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#257
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,963
of 253,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.