You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adult Mortality Attributable to Preventable Risk Factors for Non-Communicable Diseases and Injuries in Japan: A Comparative Risk Assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS Medicine, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001160 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nayu Ikeda, Manami Inoue, Hiroyasu Iso, Shunya Ikeda, Toshihiko Satoh, Mitsuhiko Noda, Tetsuya Mizoue, Hironori Imano, Eiko Saito, Kota Katanoda, Tomotaka Sobue, Shoichiro Tsugane, Mohsen Naghavi, Majid Ezzati, Kenji Shibuya |
| Abstract |
The population of Japan has achieved the longest life expectancy in the world. To further improve population health, consistent and comparative evidence on mortality attributable to preventable risk factors is necessary for setting priorities for health policies and programs. Although several past studies have quantified the impact of individual risk factors in Japan, to our knowledge no study has assessed and compared the effects of multiple modifiable risk factors for non-communicable diseases and injuries using a standard framework. We estimated the effects of 16 risk factors on cause-specific deaths and life expectancy in Japan. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 123 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 36 | 29% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| Liechtenstein | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 77 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 116 | 94% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
| Scientists | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Cameroon | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 239 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 18% |
| Researcher | 35 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 20% |
| Unknown | 62 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 15% |
| Unknown | 77 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2023.
All research outputs
#440,692
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#736
of 5,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,360
of 253,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#5
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.