| Title |
Post-burn and long-term fire effects on plants and birds in floodplain wetlands of the Russian Far East
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-019-01746-3 |
| Authors |
Ramona J. Heim, Norbert Hölzel, Thilo Heinken, Johannes Kamp, Alexander Thomas, Galina F. Darman, Sergei M. Smirenski, Wieland Heim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| Germany | 3 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Czechia | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 54% |
| Scientists | 11 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 23% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 19 | 48% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,982,714
of 24,451,685 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#277
of 2,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,886
of 356,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,451,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.