| Title |
Initial Feasibility Study of a New Transcatheter Mitral Prosthesis The First 100 Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.066 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Sorajja, Neil Moat, Vinay Badhwar, Darren Walters, Gaetano Paone, Brian Bethea, Richard Bae, Gry Dahle, Mubashir Mumtaz, Paul Grayburn, Samir Kapadia, Vasilis Babaliaros, Mayra Guerrero, Lowell Satler, Vinod Thourani, Francesco Bedogni, David Rizik, Paolo Denti, Nicolas Dumonteil, Thomas Modine, Ajay Sinhal, Michael L. Chuang, Jeffrey J. Popma, Philipp Blanke, Jonathon Leipsic, David Muller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 35% |
| Spain | 9 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 7% |
| Mexico | 6 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 66% |
| Scientists | 20 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 130 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 19% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 47% |
| Engineering | 9 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 45 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2021.
All research outputs
#525,602
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,320
of 16,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,065
of 369,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#48
of 390 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 390 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.