You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social inequalities in male mortality, and in male mortality from smoking: indirect estimation from national death rates in England and Wales, Poland, and North America
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68975-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Prabhat Jha, Richard Peto, Witold Zatonski, Jillian Boreham, Martin J Jarvis, Alan D Lopez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| India | 4 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 210 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 19% |
| Unknown | 33 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#749,515
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#6,258
of 43,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,090
of 91,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#10
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.