| Title |
Energy cost of ambulation in trans-tibial amputees using a dynamic-response foot with hydraulic versus rigid ‘ankle’: insights from body centre of mass dynamics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-019-0508-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Graham N. Askew, Laura A. McFarlane, Alberto E. Minetti, John G. Buckley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 22 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 7% |
| Design | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#13,643,324
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#659
of 1,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,097
of 351,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#16
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.