| Title |
Do floral syndromes predict specialization in plant pollination systems? An experimental test in an “ornithophilous” African Protea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, May 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-004-1495-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna L. Hargreaves, Steven D. Johnson, Erica Nol |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 5 | 3% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 145 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 23% |
| Unknown | 20 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 106 | 62% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,730,207
of 23,504,694 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,718
of 4,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,005
of 58,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,694 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.