| Title |
China’s Primary Programs of Terrestrial Ecosystem Restoration: Initiation, Implementation, and Challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Management, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00267-009-9373-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Runsheng Yin, Guiping Yin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 20% |
| Researcher | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 31 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2014.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#811
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,020
of 110,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.