You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Floral traits mediate the vulnerability of aloes to pollen theft and inefficient pollination by bees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Botany, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1093/aob/mcr324 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna L. Hargreaves, Lawrence D. Harder, Steven D. Johnson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 20% |
| Researcher | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
| Professor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 64% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#2,387
of 3,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,355
of 252,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.