| Title |
Knowledge mining sensory evaluation data: genetic programming, statistical techniques, and swarm optimization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10710-011-9153-2 |
| Authors |
Kalyan Veeramachaneni, Ekaterina Vladislavleva, Una-May O’Reilly |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 20 | 49% |
| Engineering | 4 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2012.
All research outputs
#4,119,577
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
#14
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,078
of 246,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them