Title |
Evidence for Using Bisphosphonate to Treat Legg‐Calvé‐Perthes Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11999-011-2240-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Megan L. Young, David G. Little, Harry K. W. Kim |
Abstract |
The rationale for using bisphosphonate (BP) therapy for Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) is the potential to prevent substantial femoral head deformity during the fragmentation phase by inhibiting osteoclastic bone resorption. However, it is unclear whether BP therapy decreases femoral head deformity. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 51 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 13% |
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
Researcher | 5 | 10% |
Other | 14 | 27% |
Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 67% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2,440
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,434
of 188,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#36
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.