↓ Skip to main content

Provider Counseling and Weight Loss Outcomes in a Primary Care-Based Digital Obesity Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Provider Counseling and Weight Loss Outcomes in a Primary Care-Based Digital Obesity Treatment
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-04944-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan McVay, Dori Steinberg, Sandy Askew, Gary G. Bennett

Abstract

Primary care-based digital health weight loss interventions offer promise for addressing obesity in underserved populations. To determine if primary care providers' weight counseling is associated with weight change during a weight loss intervention. This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial testing a 12-month primary care-based digital health weight loss intervention. Participants were community health center patients with body mass indexes of 30-44.9 kg/m2. The weight loss intervention included tailored behavioral goal setting; weekly goal monitoring via text messaging or interactive voice response calls; counseling calls; skills training material; and participant-tailored recommendations for provider counseling. At 6 and 12 months, participants' weight was measured and they reported if their provider delivered weight counseling (general or intervention-specific) at their most recent visit and their perception of providers' empathy. Providers' documentation of weight counseling was extracted from health records. Participants (n = 134-141) were predominantly female (70%) and African American (55%) with a mean age of 51 years and BMI of 36 kg/m2. Participant-reported provider weight counseling was not associated with weight change. However, participants whose providers documented intervention-specific counseling at any point during the intervention (n = 35) lost 3.1 kg (95% CI 0.4 to 5.7 kg) more than those whose providers documented only general weight counseling (n = 82) and 4.0 kg (95% CI 0.1 to 7.9 kg) more than those whose providers did not document weight counseling (n = 17). Perceptions of provider empathy were associated with greater weight loss from 6 to 12 months (0.8 kg per measure unit, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.5 kg, p = .03). Provider counseling that focuses specifically on engagement in a weight loss intervention may enhance weight loss outcomes relative to more general weight loss advice. Counseling that enhances patients' perceptions of empathy may be most beneficial for patients' weight loss. NCT 01827800.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Professor 8 8%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 40 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 18 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Psychology 6 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 43 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#612,352
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#486
of 8,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,159
of 364,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#12
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.