↓ Skip to main content

Can citizen science data guide the surveillance of invasive plants? A model-based test with Acacia trees in Portugal

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Can citizen science data guide the surveillance of invasive plants? A model-based test with Acacia trees in Portugal
Published in
Biological Invasions, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10530-019-01962-6
Authors

Nuno César de Sá, Hélia Marchante, Elizabete Marchante, João Alexandre Cabral, João Pradinho Honrado, Joana Raquel Vicente

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 23%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 19 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 23%
Environmental Science 14 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 22 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,652,179
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#540
of 2,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,802
of 366,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#21
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.