↓ Skip to main content

A social impact quantification framework for the resource extraction industry

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
A social impact quantification framework for the resource extraction industry
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11367-019-01605-x
Authors

Susie R. Wu, Ilke Celik, Defne Apul, Jiquan Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 23 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 13%
Engineering 9 13%
Unspecified 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 28 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#821
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,970
of 355,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.