↓ Skip to main content

A Cautionary Tale of Topography and Tilt from Kīlauea Caldera

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Cautionary Tale of Topography and Tilt from Kīlauea Caldera
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, April 2019
DOI 10.1029/2018gl081757
Authors

Jessica H. Johnson, Michael P. Poland, Kyle R. Anderson, Juliet Biggs

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 64%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 6 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,688,068
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#7,246
of 19,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,412
of 350,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#146
of 332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.