| Title |
Genetic determinants of renal transplant outcome: where do we stand?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nephrology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40620-014-0053-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul J. Phelan, Peter J. Conlon, Matthew A. Sparks |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 26% |
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 16% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 23% |
| Psychology | 3 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,009,268
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nephrology
#153
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,063
of 320,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nephrology
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.